Webb16 maj 2005 · In Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc. v. People,[24] this Court held that such an appeal would be impermissible for the following reasons: An appeal from the sentence … WebbIn Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc. v. People, this Court held that such an appeal would be impermissible for [24] the following reasons: An appeal from the sentence of the trial court implies a waiver of the constitutional safeguard against double jeopardy and throws the whole case open to a review by the appellate court.

ROLITO CALANG v. PEOPLE - Lawyerly

WebbPHILIPPINE RABBIT BUS LINES v. PEOPLE, GR No. 147703, 2004-04-14 Facts: When the accused-employee absconds or jumps bail, the judgment meted out becomes final and … WebbThe trial court dismissed the complaint against Transport Constractors, Inc. and Modesto Joaquin but ordered Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc. and Nicasio de los Reyes to pay solidarily the plaintiff P25,085.40 as compensatory damages, P5,000.00 as moral damages, P 2,000.00 as attorney’s fees and the costs of the suit. camp waldemar employment

Philippine Rabbit - Wikipedia

Webb3 aug. 2010 · Employers shall be liable for the damages caused by their employees and household helpers acting within the scope of their assigned tasks, even though the former are not engaged in any business or industry. [3] Pangonorom v. People, 495 Phil. 195 (2005). [4] Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc. v. People, G.R. No. 147703, April 14, 2004, … http://ww.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1990/aug1990/gr_l_66102_04_1990.html Webb14 apr. 2004 · G.R. No. 147703 April 14, 2004 PANGANIBAN, J. PHILIPPINE RABBIT BUS LINES, INC., vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Doctrine: When the accused-employee … fish and chips doordash